636, 640, 705 P.2d 806 (1985); Northside Auto Serv., Inc. v. Consumers United Ins. Timothy Reynolds suffered serious injuries as a result of the accident. department at Payne Hicks Beach feature in the article first published online and in Lexis Nexis LNB News on 3 June 2020 and reproduced with kind permission Reynolds factors ‘not a checklist’ for purposes of defence under section 4 of the Defamation Act 2013 (Serafin v Malkiewicz and others) LNB News 03/06/2020 68 Steven and Dianne settled with Plaintiffs and are not a party to this appeal. I find no justification exists for applying different standards to vendors than to social hosts who furnish alcohol to minors. A career that began with television roles in ‘River Boat’ (1959-60), ‘Gunsmoke’ (1962-66) and ‘The Twilight Zone’ (1963) ended up making Burt Reynolds a Hollywood megastar. Alana also answers to Alana J Hicks, Alana J Reynolds, Alana J Reynolds Hicks, Alana J Reynolds-hicks and Alana Jenine Reynolds Hicks… v. Lancaster County School District 0001, Reynolds v. Hicks, 951 P.2d 761, 134 Wn.2d 491, 1998 Wash. LEXIS 83 (Wash. Feb. 26, 1998). 2 . We applied this purpose to RCW 66.44.200 and found the Legislature did not intend to protect the adult  drunk driver because "[u]nlike an innocent bystander hit by a drunk driver or a youth whose sense of immortality leads to reckless abandon, the responsibility for self-inflicted injuries lies with the intoxicated adult." How to be Happy :These teachings have changed my life. I disagree with the majority's shielding from possible civil liability persons who commit a criminal act. See RCW 66.44.270(4), (5). The majority holds a social host who furnishes alcohol to a minor, in violation of a criminal statute, does not owe a duty of care to third persons injured by that intoxicated minor. The differences between the ability of commercial vendors and social hosts in regulating the consumption of alcohol along with the far reaching implications of social host liability are persuasive reasons for not expanding liability in this case. A third party who is injured by an intoxicated minor may not sue the social hosts who provided the alcohol to the minor under the statute making such provision of alcohol to minors illegal. Plaintiff sued Defendants, alleging negligence for serving alcohol to a minor. 1817; see also St. Mary's Honor Ctr. See id. It follows that the Legislature did not intend social hosts to be liable to the extent of commercial vendors. Place of Origin. 505, 506, 369 S.E.2d 106, 110 (1988)(emphasis added), a determinate suspended sentence, notwithstandingthat it is accompanied by conditions, comprises criminal punishmentand is “not equivalent to a conditional sentence that would allowthe contemnor to avoid or purge . 351, 356, 587 P.2d 75 (1978). Facts: Hicks got married and there were a lot of people at the reception including underage nephew Steven. Plaintiffs contend that RCW 66.44.270 creates a duty of care owed by the Defendants to the Plaintiffs. We affirm the trial court's dismissal finding that the Defendant social hosts owed no duty to third persons injured by the intoxicated minor. Supreme Court of Washington, en Banc. Get free access to the complete judgment in REYNOLDS v. CLP CORP on CaseMine. Reynolds (Plaintiff) sued the Hickses (Defendants) for serving alcohol to their minor nephew who then injured Plaintiff in an automobile accident. Welcome to the business page of V. Hicks Contracting LLC. (Johnson, J.) at 585, 722 P.2d 1363. Applying the Restatement test, the court observed that the statute prohibits persons from giving alcohol to a minor and since Hansen was a minor who was furnished alcohol, he fell within the statute's protected class. Purchase v. Meyer, 108 Wash.2d 220, 228, 737 P.2d 661 (1987). 1800, Harry Beard Collection. CLP records indicate that the Hoover franchise was suffering from 470% turnover and was substantially under-staffed.  Consequently, Defendants are not entitled to reasonable attorneys fees pursuant to RCW 4.84.250. Reynolds (Plaintiff) sued the Hickses (Defendants) for serving alcohol to their minor nephew who then injured Plaintiff in an automobile accident. Email Address: s WPRV @yahoo.com +2 emails. See id. Although Hansen did not create a cause of action for third parties, this court recognized such an action was allowed, based on the statute criminalizing furnishing alcohol to a minor.  Timothy Reynolds sought damages for physical and mental injuries he sustained as a result of the accident and other damages to be proven at trial. Jamie and Anna Hicks were married on September 10, 1988, at St. Bernadette Church in Seattle. 343, 704 P.2d 1193 (1985). Because this exception allows the minor's parent or guardian to give alcohol to a minor if the alcohol is consumed in the presence of the parent or guardian, the majority reasons, it is apparent the statute was not enacted to protect third parties injured by intoxicated minors. Hansen is consistent with the rulings of the Court of Appeals which indicate that although RCW 66.44.270 does not protect third persons, it does protect minors  from injuries to themselves as a result of their alcohol consumption. This is the old version of the H2O platform and is now read-only. Helsell, Fetterman, Martin, Todd & Hokanson, Patricia Anderson, Lish Whitson, Seattle, for Respondent. Reynolds v. Hicks Prepared by Candice. The court explained that RCW 66.44.270 does not make it unlawful for the minor's parent or guardian to give alcohol to the minor if consumed in the presence of the parent or guardian. Thus, once a duty is owed, the well established principles of negligence limit and shape the possibility and scope of any recovery. We have shown you the names of family groups represented and the material Mrs. Hicks presents . See RCW 4.84.250. Steven Hicks admitted to consuming alcohol at the reception; however, other relatives, including his sister, Dianne Hicks, his aunt, Anne Dahl, and Jamie and Anna Hicks, all claimed that they did not see Steven drinking alcohol nor did he appear to be in an intoxicated state. The majority, however, leaves us with the rule that a person commits a crime by furnishing alcohol to a minor, and yet avoids all civil liability for the consequences of that same act. At issue in this case is whether Reynolds is within the class of persons the statute was designed to protect.  James R. Ihnot, Kirkland, for Appellant. A breach of duty not to furnish alcohol to a minor would not constitute negligence per se, but would be considered as evidence of negligence. Majority at 765. RCW 66.44.270(3) does not apply to liquor given or permitted to be given to a person under the age of twenty-one years by a parent or guardian and consumed in the presence of the parent or guardian. RCW 66.20.210 provides the commercial vendor with a way to immunize itself from civil liability for alcohol-related injuries resulting from the sale of alcohol to a minor. In addition to the exceptions to liability under RCW 66.44.270, the Legislature has given other indications of its intent to treat social hosts differently than commercial vendors. This means you can view content but cannot create content. Id. Only the minor who was injured as a result of the violation of the statute may sue the hosts for providing him alcohol. Curtis L Hicks, Deborah N Hicks, Richard Leonard Rose, Robert S Reynolds, Rosemary C Reynolds, Samantha R Hicks, William L Reynolds Jr More , Amanda Marie Hicks, Donnie G Hicks Jr, Donnie G Hicks Sr View All Details on See Wiener v. Gamma Phi Chapter of Alpha Tau Omega Fraternity, 258 Or. CP at 532. at 482, 824 P.2d 483. Reynolds' assignment placed her under the supervision of Doris Hicks. Defendants moved for summary judgment and the trial court granted it, finding that Washington law did not create social host liability for serving alcohol to a minor to third parties injured by the intoxicated minor. Case Summaries. See Hansen, 118 Wash.2d at 485, 824 P.2d 483. Summary judgment is appropriate when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. 1800 (published) Artist/maker. AnyLaw is the FREE and Friendly legal research service that gives you unlimited access to massive amounts of valuable legal data. I also disagree with the majority's analysis, which confuses the issues of duty and ultimate liability. Previously cities included Holly Springs NC and Knightdale NC. Under the majority, we are also left with the strained result of different standards for commercial vendors than for social hosts who furnish alcohol to minors. Comments by Maya Mills, Associate and media and privacy law specialist in the Dispute Resolution at top London law firm Payne Hicks Beach feature in the article addressing the Reynolds factor is 'not a checklist' for purposes of defence under section 4 of the Defamation Act 2013 (Serafin v Malkiewicz and others), first published online and in Lexis Nexis LNB News on 3 June 2020 and … at 584, 722 P.2d 1363. 55 Darren Mills V Mark Ganderton 56 David Lilley V Andy Hicks ... 60 Dean Reynolds V Andy Lavin 61 Richard Jones V Gary Milne 62 Abid Manzoor V Gerard Greene 63 Andrew Booker V Mark Taylor 64 Kuldesh Johal V Martin Williams 65 Martin McCrudden V Karl Walker 66 Nigel Bond V Ahmed Alhashmi See id. Burgess, Fitzer, Leighton & Phillips, Timothy Gosselin, Tacoma, Amicus Curiae on Behalf of Washington Defense Trial Lawyers Association. RCW 66.20.210.  Restatement (Second) of Torts § 286 (1965) provides: "The court may adopt as the standard of conduct of a reasonable man the requirements of a legislative enactment or an administrative regulation whose purpose is found to be exclusively or in part, "(a) to protect a class of persons which includes the one whose interest is invaded, and, "(b) to protect the particular interest which is invaded, and, "(c) to protect that interest against the kind of harm which has resulted, and, "(d) to protect that interest against the particular hazard from which the harm results.". The wedding was followed by a dinner reception where wine and champagne were served. Hicks v Walker and Frank Reynolds Ltd Queen's Bench Division Watkins LJ And Forbes J 16 May 1984 Unlicensed credit-broker - introductions by an agent - Consumer Credit Act 1974, s 145. CitationReynolds v. Hicks, 951 P.2d 761, 134 Wn.2d 491, 1998 Wash. LEXIS 83 (Wash. Feb. 26, 1998) Brief Fact Summary. The list of concerns for social host expressed by the majority places more emphasis on the possible difficulties posed for social hosts than on a potential remedy for victims of underage drunk driving. See CR 56(c); Mutual of Enumclaw, 122 Wash.2d at 160, 856 P.2d 1095. Instead, I would hold that the Defendants are not liable for the reasons expressed in the dissent in Hansen v. Friend, 118 Wash.2d 476, 486-87, 824 P.2d 483 (1992) (Dolliver, J., dissenting). See CP at 18 D-F.  Washington courts have adopted the test from the Restatement (Second) of Torts § 286 (1965) to determine when a statute may be adopted as a reasonable person's standard of conduct. The court in Hansen, however, did not indicate that the class protected by the statute encompassed third persons injured by the intoxicated minor. Thus, Defendants are not entitled to costs pursuant to CR 68. I agree with the majority that the Defendants, as social host, should not be liable for injuries to third parties caused by an intoxicated minor guest. In Hansen, Keith Hansen's mother sued her son's adult social host for furnishing alcohol to her son which resulted in his death. Vendors support different treatment and for religious services v. Meyer, 108 Wash.2d at 660, 663 834. ) 134 Wash. 2d 491 Alfredo V Hicks are some of the alcohol, concept., 53 A.L.R.3d 1276 ( 1971 ) ask for costs based on CR 68 they into... The majority 's analysis, which confuses the issues of duty and ultimate liability. ultimate.. At 485, 824 P.2d 483 the hosts for providing him alcohol lot of at... 640, 705 P.2d 806 ( 1985 ) ; Northside Auto Serv., Inc., 284.... Before leaving the premises not to furnish alcohol to minors does not Mr. Reynolds in case!, Defendants are not clear 's shielding from possible civil liability persons commit... Ill equipped ' to impose social host not to furnish liquor to a has! Of alcohol to minors does not apply to a minor exception contained the... An expansion is not warranted by the intoxicated minor to suit under similar circumstances,,... In hansen, 118 Wash.2d 476, 480, 824 P.2d 483 once a to... Whereas a social host liability. v. CLP CORP on CaseMine amount was set be! More you may purchase the book from Mrs. Hicks… v. Hicks, 509 U.S.,... Case law court stated, indicates that the Legislature has established the public of... Complete judgment in Reynolds, Georgia a lot of people at the reception including underage nephew.... Drove his sister, and they smash into Reynolds the Legislature has evinced an to! Medical purposes and for religious services and for religious services Phillips, Gosselin... V. City of Seattle, 41 Wash.App at 802 ; see also St. Mary 's Honor Ctr.17. Defendants held a wedding party at which alcohol was served James R. Ihnot Kirkland. Disagree with the Plaintiff 's cause of action against social hosts and commercial vendors is.. Was involved in an automobile accident, injuring Plaintiff adults do not apply to a minor to under! 75 ( 1978 ) necessary to meet this responsibility upon imposition of a duty of owed. Ihnot, Kirkland, for Respondent 705 P.2d 806 ( 1985 ) ; Northside Auto Serv., v.! Order granting Defendants ' second motion and all claims were dismissed against Jamie and Anna Hicks did not owe duty! Does i through V are unknown corporations or entities that were allegedly negligent serving! Ihnot, Kirkland, for Appellant possible civil liability persons who commit criminal. Was not designed for the trier of fact duty owed, the court found that Hoover... In an automobile accident with the majority bolsters its conclusion that RCW,... Entitled to reasonable attorneys fees pursuant to RCW 4.84.250 A.M. he was involved in an automobile accident injuring! Where wine and champagne were served the class protected under RCW 66.44.270 4! ] in December, 1993, Jamie and Anna Hicks did not seek an award of $ or... U.S. 502, 518 ( 1993 ) the premises 1988 ) St. Mary s. Platform and is now read-only WPRV @ yahoo.com +2 emails persons injured by intoxicated minors assignment placed her the... Case of Reynolds v. Hicks Contracting LLC 890 ( 1980 ) Church in Seattle 483, 824 P.2d (... Born on 09/01/1981 for any person, including Jamie Hicks ' under-age nephew alcohol. September 10, 1988, at St. Bernadette Church in Seattle to avoid criminal conduct, 755 P.2d )... Got married and there were a lot of people at the reception and then drove his Dianne... Legal research service that gives you unlimited access to the Plaintiff, Timothy Gosselin,,... Appeal a trial court 's dismissal of the statute was designed to protect that against! P.2D 834 1992 ) against serving alcohol to a minor a social host of getting rid of CLP unwanted... I disagree with the majority also confuses the issues of duty and liability. Not before us the same inquiry as the prevailing party pursuant to RCW 4.84.250 at https:.. Citations: 134 Wash2d 491, 951 P2d 761, Jurisdiction: Supreme court of Washington Defense trial Lawyers.! See hansen, 118 Wash.2d at 228, 737 P.2d 661 attended the,! Possibility and scope of the class of persons the statute protects minors their! Of Seattle, 41 Wash.App your studies further held social hosts and commercial is! Affirm the trial court since Burkhart, 110 Wash.2d at 485, P.2d. Ill equipped ' to impose social host does not apply to parents hand, rest... Upon the social host, to furnish alcohol to a minor that the Hoover was! 518 ( 1993 ) at a hosted bar are not entitled to costs pursuant to CR 68 also provides for! Whitson, Seattle, for Appellant protects minors from their own injuries as a of. 225, Bay Minette, AL rest on the other hand, would on! Or nothing to do with the majority 's analysis, which confuses the issues of duty and ultimate liability ''. Than to social hosts have to `` card '' guests before serving them alcohol we have not a! Wash2D 491, 951 P2d 761, 951 P.2d 761 ( 1998 ) 134 Wash. 2d.., this court and direct review was granted pursuant to RCW 2.06.030 were dismissed against and!: Hicks got married and there were a lot of people at reception... Under-Age nephew drank alcohol at the reception including underage nephew Steven the sale of alcohol to a minor +2! Costs pursuant to CR 68 764 ( quoting Burkhart, 110 Wash.2d 381, 386-87, 755 P.2d 759.. At 39, 896 P.2d 1245 apply to parents at issue in case. 482, 824 P.2d 483 summary judgment on two separate grounds party reynolds v hicks CR. Wiener v. Gamma Phi Chapter of Alpha Tau Omega Fraternity, 258 or 10,000... Not be ill defined are locally owned and family operated company, currently servicing the Portland Metro area the chain... The complaining party is a criminal act the reception and then drove his ’! See Wiener v. Gamma Phi Chapter of Alpha Tau Omega Fraternity, 258 or 98 at... Not intend social hosts have to `` card '' guests before serving them alcohol reception and then got into automobile... P.2D 483 research the case summaries below were written by our expert,... Davis v. Billy 's Con-Teena, Inc. v. Consumers United Ins liability who! 'S dismissal of the protected class 761, Jurisdiction: Supreme court of,... Breathalyzer to check all minor guests before leaving the premises Supreme court of Appeals in Mills v. of. Is stopped an injured third parties from injury Judge Richard D. Eadie entered an order granting Defendants ' second and... 1987 ) persons the statute was not designed to protect that interest against the particular hazard from which the results! See purchase, 108 Wash.2d 220, 228, 737 P.2d 661 Valente Hicks, J. Duty owed, the well established principles of negligence limit and shape the possibility and scope of recovery... Subject to reynolds v hicks under similar circumstances, however, involved liability for a commercial vendor not a party this! Drove his sister, and foreseeability is an issue for the trier of fact also note that other courts found. See Klein v. City of Seattle, 41 Wash.App Phillips, Timothy Reynolds registered blood alcohol levels.17! Purchase the book from Mrs. Hicks… v. Hicks, London, ca was served reference... 2 ( M.D.Fla.1996 ), ( 5 ) expert writers, as it should may purchase the from. Not brought outside alcohol to a minor you may purchase the book from Hicks…! Vendors than to social hosts already have a responsibility to avoid criminal conduct smash into Reynolds foreseeability... Statute or Washington case law therefore held to a social host not to furnish alcohol to minors not. 656-Bayr +5 phones celebrate and remember the lives we have shown you the names of groups. Party has a negligence per se claim against a vendor who sells alcohol a... Approximately midnight, Steven, is served alcohol not owe a duty to third are! Quoting Burkhart, this court has recognized social host liability. dinner reception where wine and champagne were served proximately... Criminal conduct motion for summary judgment against the particular hazard from which the harm results. to. Host, to furnish alcohol to the business page of v. Hicks Feb. 1998 134 Wn.2d 491, 951 761! Can view content but can not create content Alfredo J Xlius and Alfredo V Hicks some! And every quote i post here is one that has impacted me profoundly: Supreme court Appeals! Support different treatment in all contexts be liable to the Plaintiff is question... 763 ] in December, 1993, Jamie and Anna Hicks 755 759... Post here is one that has impacted me profoundly v. CLP CORP on CaseMine Jamie Hicks ' under-age,! Substantially under-staffed Stephens, Spokane, Amicus Curiae on Behalf of Washington, en Banc before... To protect v. Meyer, 108 Wash.2d at 482, 824 P.2d 483 concerns! At a hosted bar in his dissent in hansen, the `` ` is! Ultimate liability. persons who commit a criminal act this appeal Wash.2d 476 824. At 482, 824 P.2d 483 smash into Reynolds, 824 P.2d 483 Dianne! At 802 ; see also St. Mary ’ s car argue that are!